Peter Attia· MD
and there was no benefit in humans MH
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and there was no benefit in humans MH
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
why would you think given how favorable this has been in mice it would not occur in humans that the products that in Ed up in the circulation of humans was a very different nature than in mice I mean uh you know the number of things that differ between humans and mice and blood would be enormous so pinning it down would be but I think there probably uh is some reason to suspect that it may work
Of course parabiosis itself is not a therapeutic regimen. I mean, presumably, you would not be too keen to do that.