The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a new trend over the last I would say five six years of people posting the papers that they've submitted to journals for peer review online so that people can look at them prior to those papers being peer reviewed so there is a strong possibility that the final version of this paper which again we will provide a link to is going to look different maybe even quite a bit different than the one that we're going to discuss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.