Paul Saladino· MD
so what that means to me is nine minus four leaves five that's the plant agriculture is five percent of the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so what that means to me is nine minus four leaves five that's the plant agriculture is five percent of the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look worldwide to figure for animal agriculture worldwide percent of greenhouse gas emissions is something like I think it's like 14 15 16 percent total
animal agriculture is 4 to 6 percent and plant agriculture is 4 to 6 percent you know of total greenhouse gas emissions
agriculture which has combined plant and animal agriculture accounts for between 11 and 13 percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions
if we eliminated all animal agriculture from the United States it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by something like 0.39%