Andrew Huberman· PhD
Whereas abstract creative work was supported by these higher ceilings.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Whereas abstract creative work was supported by these higher ceilings.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you want to do creative work during phase two, the nine to 16 hours of your circadian cycle, nine to 16 hours after waking that is, that you do that in the high ceiling room, or maybe even outdoors out on a deck or on a patio. Cause the highest ceiling of courses is the sky. Whereas if you're going to do detailed analytic work I would suggest doing that during phase one of the day. But even if you're going to do it during phase two of the day, for whatever reason, scheduling or other sorts of constraints that you do that in the lower ceiling environment.
In contrast, if you're interested in doing brainstorming, creative work, you're writing new things, you're creating new things of any kind, artwork, consider getting into a high ceiling or no ceiling environment.