The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
our biology is electromagnetic we may you know food's important water is important we eat let's say three times a day we drink water I don't know eight 10 times a day you're consuming electromagnetic inputs 247 365 days a year that's just a fact that's undebatable so we should think about our electromagnetic environment and we should measure it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.