The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But we do this as, you know, humans too, right? And it's like I you can you walk into a business meeting, you walk into a conference room and you know it's these subtle cues that are con you we can't don't always suppress them. We show them whether we think we do or we don't.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, if I play marmicetses have, you know, call some of their calls are really antipinal. They're to see, hey, are you out there? Am I alone? Who else is around? ... In the case of, you know, look, it's um you know, there's something to be scar threatened of. You're going to see dilation and you're also going to see some scanning, but it's not as slow. It's a lot faster because there's a threat to me. I my you know, my autonomic system and my cognitive system are like be reacting differently. And in the case of you're in my face, it's going to be, you know, without even so without seeing you, if I hear another, you know, sort of aggressive sound, I'm going to react. I'm going to be, you know, I'm not scanning anywhere, but I my dilation is going to be fast and, you know, my and I'm also going to be much more on top of things.