The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and they survive better when times are good and during epidemics and during famines and so there's something about their biology that allows them to survive better and it doesn't seem to depend on conditions that's very different from a lot of animals where it depends on the diet it depends on the circumstances
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and their 40s so they survive better at every age and they survive better when times are good and during epidemics and during famines and so there's something about their biology that allows them to survive better and it doesn't seem to depend on conditions