Andrew Huberman· PhD
The way Belcampo raises its animals is also good for the environment. They practice regenerative agriculture, which means it's climate positive and carbon negative which translates to good for us and good for the planet.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The way Belcampo raises its animals is also good for the environment. They practice regenerative agriculture, which means it's climate positive and carbon negative which translates to good for us and good for the planet.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
They practice regenerative agriculture, which means that their meat is climate positive and carbon negative, meaning it's good for you, and it's good for the environment.
I think these are farms are producing some of the best meat on the planet probably certainly within the United States and doing the right thing for regenerating the ground
they have shown that they can increase the amount of carbon in the soil increase the amount of organic matter in the soil in profound ways
this is the argument against uh plant-based diets this is how we regenerate the earth this is how we put carbon back into the earth they are leading the way here as well as other farms that i support