We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the Imp iCal evidence um just doesn't bear that out and so it was kind of a mystery the mystery is how is it that you feel angry or sad or happy or you know full of gratitude or awe how is it that you experience these moments but scientists can't find a single set of physical markers that correspond with each state distinctively right that in in a way that you could tell them apart
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.