The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a lot of it to reconcile those experiments you first account for the fact that they're probably in different species right you take out a particular portion of a pig or a rabbit grain a small amount you might not see a difference but a small portion of a human brain say the part most interested in coordinating speech or finger movement and you're going to see profound losses or visual cortex right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.