The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
our 512 electrod technology which you've seen in our lab and stuff that developed with collaborators um about 20 years ago um was crucial for this because with that 512 electrode technology we could see many cells of each type and we could clearly parse them apart from one another whereas previous studies working on one cell at a time had great difficulty doing that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.