We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Since aging clocks were not specifically designed to independently predict the effects of of various therapies or interventions on aging, their accuracy in determining the effect of a particular therapy on epigenetic age is yet to be fully established as they sometimes isolate particular negative effects, while neglecting positive effects that can still be beneficial to extending life-and health-spans.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.