The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is the idea to build a robotic retina to build a a essentially an artificial retina that could be put into the eye of a blind person or even put into the eye of a sighted person that would fundamentally change their ability to see or in the latter case uh enhance their ability to extract things from the visual world that they would otherwise not be able to see like like seeing twice as far um getting you know hawk-like resolution of the visual World
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.