Andrew Huberman· PhD
but at the level of the intercostals and the diaphragm, their contraction is not, is almost agnostic to whether or not the nose and mouth are open.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but at the level of the intercostals and the diaphragm, their contraction is not, is almost agnostic to whether or not the nose and mouth are open.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But at the level of the intercostals and the diaphragm, their contraction uh is not is almost uh agnostic to whether or not the nose and mouth are open.