The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you have these two muscular walls one of them runs longitudinally so runs in the direction of the lumen and one runs orthogonal to that it runs circularly this is one of the things i remember from anatomy was that you have these things where if the circular inner layer contracts that shrinks the lumen and the longitudinal one as it contracts shortens it along its long axis and i think that's what permits this remarkable peristaltic rhythmic contraction of the gut
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.