The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
his his work as well as from all the people that have done the genetics on this is the variability that exists within what someone calls an indicia or a sativa is uh greater than the variability that there is between them and there's no there is no such thing as a chemical profile that exists in something that's a sativa versus something that's an indicia
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the Inda sativa names at least from everything I've understood from everyone that I talk to and being in this field is it's those are are Botanical terms that largely refer to shape of the plant the you know the way the bud grows blah blah blah they do not track with chemical composition in any way