Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
Realized by doing a little bit of a web search that it's available over the counter and that certain people like to take it often, like every day at low doses or even higher doses, and that there was huge variation in terms of the amount of kratom in the various products and how much people were taking. Some people talking about kratom as something it was as if it were innocuous. And we can ask whether or not indeed it is innocuous.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.