Andrew Huberman· PhD
It turns out to carry information uh about how far the eyes are moving to the left or to the right as well as a bit less but some information about vertical movements as well.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It turns out to carry information uh about how far the eyes are moving to the left or to the right as well as a bit less but some information about vertical movements as well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, we were able to measure that the eardrum is is basically moving in connection with with every eye movement, every psychic eye movement. These are the fast jerky eye movements. The signal is very precisely time locked to the onset of the eye movement
and the effect um is different in the two ears. So that if your eyes are moving to the left, the eardrum on the right is going to kind of uh bulge inward then outward then inward. I might have this backwards um but whatever the right ear is doing the left ear is doing the opposite so that the eardrums are going to be moving in the same direction. One is going to be inward when the other is going outward