The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the more that you start to answer those questions about the context the better you'll you'll start to understand hey maybe that was the cue and i bet if you do that exercise for whatever the particular habit is that you're working on just do that for you may not even need to do it for a week but if you do it for five days or seven days or something you're gonna start to develop a good sense for what it is that's prompting the behavior
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
each time that you find yourself eating a candy bar just pull up a note on your phone or have an index card or a notebook or whatever somewhere to record it write down what time is it where are you at right now what's the what's the context what's the environment who are you around are you near the do you eat these by the same kind of people what were you doing just before this