The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
emfs are noise in our environment you and I we're in a room sitting across from each other can hear you very clearly it's great conversation there's no issue the signal is very strong now imagine if there were a hundred people or even 20 people in this room and we were all talking it would be really hard to understand what you're saying and like we might miscommunicate we might you know perceive each other in in the wrong manner that's what's happening in our biology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.