Bryan Johnson· Author
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine evaluated over 2,000 participants with initial heart conditions and those with low hrr had an all cause mortality risk 400% higher in a six-year follow-up
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine evaluated over 2,000 participants with initial heart conditions and those with low hrr had an all cause mortality risk 400% higher in a six-year follow-up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it really is an important marker that for tells what's going to happen in the future whether you are likely to live or die