Andrew Huberman· PhD
I think that's you're every one of your doctors of the future is going to have to do this stuff.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that's you're every one of your doctors of the future is going to have to do this stuff.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And so, for example, I didn't realize I knew my CD8T cells. Again, this gets a little specialized, but they were low. Uh, which I did see on the report, but it has this whole zinc recommendation thing. I don't know if that's right, but I'm going to look into it more. It can make suggestions that no doctor is going to figure out with all this stuff. So, you do need these new systems, and that is the future. We're all going to have our own personalized systems pulling data.