Peter Attia· MD
they're probably getting a little more cancer significantly more renal failure as a proximate cause of death as opposed to dying with renal insufficiency which - you're pointing a lot of humans are you
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they're probably getting a little more cancer significantly more renal failure as a proximate cause of death as opposed to dying with renal insufficiency which - you're pointing a lot of humans are you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they live in our environment right and you know they also seem to to die of things that more closely replicate how we die they die of heart failure they die of cancer