The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, they didn't ask whether you got COVID actually because there are people who got CO and never had any symptoms, right? So, they didn't ask in the trial about prevention of transmission. They could have, right? So, for instance, the people who in the placebo arm, you could ask whether their household members had COVID at higher rates than the household members of the people who in the treatment arm. Compare the household members and ask. They didn't ask that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.