Andrew Huberman· PhD
So those are the make-love-not-war neurons, and VMH are the make-war-not-love neurons, and there are dense interconnections between these two nuclei, which are very close to each other in the brain.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So those are the make-love-not-war neurons, and VMH are the make-war-not-love neurons, and there are dense interconnections between these two nuclei, which are very close to each other in the brain.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If we inactivate these cells, if we silence these cells or if we kill the cells, and again, we're talking of, you know, maybe 2,000 cells. If we kill the cells, he cannot recognize females from males. Typically, he prefers the smell of a female. That preference is gone. And because he can't say that's a male or a female, he neither mates with females nor attacks other males.
So that recognitive process has induced a state in the male that says it's a female. Although the sensory input that's coming in, the pherommones that are coming in, the size, the way the animal's walking around, all screams male, he thinks it's a female. He tries to mate with him.
So there's sex recognition going on in the male mouse brain. If you record from the same cells in the female brain, those cells to be seem to be quent.