The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's variations in SE quality around the country and around the world there's Geographic variation and so that's also sort of an unknown explanation you know there could be different sort of genetic you know compositions of men and so there's different reproductive potential in that Source there could be different environmental exposures diet exercise lifestyle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a famous study done a number of years ago where they looked at se in equality among fathers so these are men that had achieved a pregnancy and at the first you know prenatal visit they had the fathers give a seaman sample and so this was done four centers around the country I think it one in California there was think one in the midwest there was one in New York so they basically found that steam in quality was sort of highest in the urban centers in New York tended to be the highest numbers where it was was you know lower in the Midwest
so they basically found that steam in quality was sort of highest in the urban centers in New York tended to be the highest numbers where it was you know lower in the Midwest and so the hypothesis was potentially because it was a more rural setting maybe there was pesticide exposure and that had led to these lower numbers