Andrew Huberman· PhD
Among the most effective tools: periodically thinking back on material *in a structured way* & figuring out where your gaps in knowledge remain, reread & repeat. It outperforms note taking.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Among the most effective tools: periodically thinking back on material *in a structured way* & figuring out where your gaps in knowledge remain, reread & repeat. It outperforms note taking.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the key aspect of testing yourself is recognizing exactly what you know and don't know and an important component of testing is running up against those things where you say h i can't remember I don't know what comes next or I'm certain that that structure is the fimbria and then you go and you look and you go it's not the fima but guess what I'll never forget for instance the location of the habenula or what it looks like