The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in other words if a kid has cross eyes um crossed eyes excuse me and they're not corrected uh until their 20s it's possible that they will never recover normal vision whereas if you recover if you align the eyes properly early in development they can indeed recover Vision
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If your child, regardless of age, but if your child has a, quote unquote, 'lazy eye,' or an eye that doesn't seem to align quite the same as the other when they're fatigued, or just naturally sits that way, it's very important to correct that early.