The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is relatively newly introduced into the United States probably would not even it's less than 10 years introduced into some areas of the u.s. was developed though over 50 years ago by Professor Sato out of Japan and it's widely used in Japan you know there's hundreds of thousands of people who are adopting it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and it can be used from from anything from professional athletes to the elderly