The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What we've created in 2025 is a very non-native EMF environment our cell phone you said is 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi Wi-Fi is yep what about the cellular signal depends where you are and what you know Network you're on but it can range from like 800 mahz to I mean technically if you're on a millimeter wave up to 30 gahz and that's it's oscillating yeah yeah and these are all non-native emfs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the radio frequency you know like light yeah this is like yeah we're designed to taking blue light not in this you know ratio but we're like radio frequencies are completely alien to our biology