Andrew Huberman· PhD
It does appear that there are things, factors in the blood of young members of a given species that are lost over time in the older members of that species.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
It does appear that there are things, factors in the blood of young members of a given species that are lost over time in the older members of that species.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But then you have also um active progrowth factors, growth factors that um stimulate the activity of cells and might you know maintain stem cells better. So they're they're truly beneficial factors, right?
the awesome result was it's tough and the young was good for the old and it could extend life by as much as 15%
I push back on that I think we do have reason to believe it's a combination of both there's data in both directions so so that's why I proposed starting with I think that's again as much as anything's sure in this field it's not that's not as sure as Rapa increases lifespan in mice but there's at least evidence to support that idea