The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so Iceland way is the anti blue zone and I talked about this in my book how the notion of blue zones is probably is almost certainly cherry picked it's a very it's it's an eerie recapitulation of Ansel keys in the seven country studies what's and viateur is done with the blue zones but Iceland is essentially a blue zone as well you can find a high concentration of centenarians there and they need a very animal centric diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
tommy notes that the diet of iceland is fish lamb pork fatty meats and these animals these ruminant animals are amazing at converting lycan and moss into meat they also eat a lot of dairy in iceland so animal products are a huge part of an icelandic diet where the rate where the number of centenarians and super centenarians per capita is higher than many places in the world
Tommy notes that the diet of Iceland is fish lamb pork fatty Meats uh and these animals these ruminant animals are amazing at converting lyan and Moss into meat they also eat a lot of dairy in Iceland so animal products are a huge part of an Icelandic diet where the rate where the number of centenarians and super centenarians per capita is higher than many places in the world and again they are eating lots of animal products