Peter Attia· MD
by the way we are right on the verge of that just that approach alone no genetic manipulation becoming an FD approv therapy finally
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by the way we are right on the verge of that just that approach alone no genetic manipulation becoming an FD approv therapy finally
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
taking those immune cells isolating them from that patient's tumor and simply expanding them right not not not not picking no genetic anything it was just grow these T yeah grow these tail yeah to a number that when he Infuse them back was could then you know systemically could then traffic through the body and Destroy um people's cancers um not not all the time but a significant minority of patients could be cured that way