Peter Attia· MD
this increased median lifespan in the male mice by 14 maximum extension of nine percent it had no effect on the females that's right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this increased median lifespan in the male mice by 14 maximum extension of nine percent it had no effect on the females that's right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we've stumbled onto a similar situation with Kagan um kagal floen we found gave a terrif this is published a few years ago lovely lifespan increase but it was in males only not in females which is really weird because it's a a great drug for diabetes in male in men and women without sex differentiation we thought it would work great in both sexes well it it turns out that the blood concentration in female mind is three times higher than in males and as they get older and older and older it the the blood concentration in the old females is 10 times the concentration of young males and it's probably toxic