The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if you've had a concussion you have torn some axons I mean luckily we have billions of them and so if you tear a couple of thousand you you will Rec you will recover but you you have torn axons it's a real neurological it's a real brain uh injury even if if even if you haven't lost uh Consciousness and you've only had symptoms for a couple of days
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the longer you've lost Consciousness and the longer your symptoms last the more axons you've you've torn there's kind of a direct relationship between the two