The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that people who have identity in being a prodigy develop a brittleness often because they associate their level of Mastery with Talent with something innate with being smarter more brilliant more more gifted whatever and then that is you think about Carol D's work in entity incremental Theories of Intelligence right that's an entity theory of intelligence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you're competing against someone who you see has that kind of psychological construction they're done you can just break them right you can f there's so many chins in the armor you can it's like so and so there's a brittleness there like you can just find where the their mind stops with in false constructs where the energy stops where where their body is crimped right like you can just find their connection to the ground and explode through it