Paul Saladino· MD
but here are the hadza which don't clinically appear to have a large amount of inflammatory bowel disease or inflammation in the gut and are not eating any processed western foods and they just have more proteobacteria
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but here are the hadza which don't clinically appear to have a large amount of inflammatory bowel disease or inflammation in the gut and are not eating any processed western foods and they just have more proteobacteria
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i mean they have a very different gut microbiome they tend to have higher proteobacteria they have the presence of spirochetes like treponema which we typically don't see in in western context they have a complete absence of bifidobacteria which we kind of consider as a keystone beneficial species in the west although that's certainly controversial