The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I used to observe this in the cafes, in and around Stanford, and the Bay area where you would see somebody who, despite the weather would be in a hoodie, maybe with a baseball cap or other form of hat or some sort of blinder above their eyebrows, which is actually another way of just lowering the ceiling height very, very low and restricting your visual field.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Or if you're wearing a brimmed hat or you're wearing a hoodie, maybe peel that back.
If you don't have access to a low ceiling environment, you might consider using a brimmed hat or even a hoodie or or even just facing down or even putting your hand above uh above your eyes as you will as a at the level of your of your eyebrows.