The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If the temptation is limbic, come in with more limbic as well as high high level concepts. Spread them out over time is what I'm hearing. what's the benefit now? What's the drawback now of making the wrong decision? And then extend that out to like tomorrow, the next day. Spending a little bit of time on these things can can mean a lot. And in the end, what we're saying is a lot of time is really like a minute.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.