David Sinclair· PhD
Can we put the free radical theory of aging to rest? It was a clever and reasonable concept but ended up not being supported by empirical evidence.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Can we put the free radical theory of aging to rest? It was a clever and reasonable concept but ended up not being supported by empirical evidence.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we used to think that free radical damage and DNA damage was the main cause right it's been very hard to reconcile that with a lot of data