The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Beyond predictive and indicative value, skin aging actually contributes to systemic aging via senescent cells and their secretions into the blood (SASP), considering the vast size of the skin, skin senescence can be a huge burden accelerating aging across the body.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
these cells have a very active secreto that my co-founder Judy Campisi discovered in 2008 and it's this is the means by which these cells exert bad biology and they secrete into the micro environment around them all this crap that distorts tissue function and that is how these cells contribute both to features of natural aging as well as very particular diseases of aging is via this secreto me called this ASP which stands for senescence associated secretory phenotype