The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, there was a day when people weren't doing any genetic testing and the embryo selection was just based on morphology, right? Yes. Yeah. Which is back in the days where we had to transfer more than one embryo because we didn't know. You could look at two embryos and they could look both normal, but one of them is chromosomally abnormal and one's not. You can't really tell.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.