Andrew Huberman· PhD
Don't email him directly. He won't see that email. Wait until there's a posting for a study, and then sign up through the correct portal.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Don't email him directly. He won't see that email. Wait until there's a posting for a study, and then sign up through the correct portal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yeah, and so in our group, so you go to Hopkinspsychedelic.org. That's the website. And if you can't remember that, just Johns Hopkins psychedelic.