Paul Saladino· MD
When did correcting the root cause of an illness become the 3rd or 4th line treatment?
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
When did correcting the root cause of an illness become the 3rd or 4th line treatment?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's the fact that the overall teaching paradigm in medicine is not aimed at the root cause of an illness
I really realized quickly that I wasn't satisfied with the mainstream medical model and was really sad that we were not treating the root cause of illness
I saw that the medical system wasn't really working to address the root cause of illness and I wanted to be able to do that