The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i haven't seen it solved if you know i guess it's the next obvious question uh and you know and that includes my group we're working on it hard we have some ideas we think are promising um but it's too early to know how much they're gonna push the bar over you know what we showed in the prior paper or what grail showed in in their recent papers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.