David Sinclair· PhD
My upcoming book endorses many such ideas & dispels just as many others.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
My upcoming book endorses many such ideas & dispels just as many others.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
That, I've been writing up in a book, which is coming out later this year in September. And so I've been so busy writing a book, I haven't even put this out in scientific publications. So maybe one of the first times that a scientist puts his whole ideas and theories in a book before it comes out in peer review.