The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think it's likely that it's effective in the short term it's probably effective in the somewhat longer term i don't think it's going to be effective for decades but i think it's likely to be effective at least for a year or two or three i think i mean we'll see and worst case scenario you could give a booster dose that would be the worst case scenario
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.