The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i knew paul that macular degeneration would have to have been rare at one point and so i thought well this will be easy i'll you know pull up up some paper that tells us about the history of macular degeneration and it'll all you know this will take me 30 minutes or a couple hours to figure out right and i was shocked to find out that i couldn't find any papers on the history of macular degeneration
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and now it's not just vegetable oils but it's all the processed foods together just like all these other chronic diseases in my view