Andrew Huberman· PhD
And what happens is that the system is being engineered to desensitize, to become agnostic for saliva to become invisible. And there is no difference on the state of the animal.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And what happens is that the system is being engineered to desensitize, to become agnostic for saliva to become invisible. And there is no difference on the state of the animal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the way you could do the experiment is because we use artificial saliva. ... No, no, we, I don't mean that you go to Walgreens that you get, I mean, we, in my laboratory, we know the composition of saliva and so you can make such a thing, and you can take taste cells in culture or in a tongue where you wash it out, and then you can apply artificial saliva.