The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Meaning that the person isn't lying. It's not like this kid um, you know, isn't as fine-tuned to taste. It's that their neurons acclimated to like what sweetness is and what contrast between sweet and saltiness is and what a peach should taste like cuz damn it, they had peach gummies and that tastes like a peach, you know.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.